My posts may include paid links for which I earn a commission.
Lately there has been a lot of talk regarding the distinction between employees and independent contractors when it comes to services like Uber and Lyft. However, the guidance being handed down could very well impact the way that many affiliates and OPMs are managing their businesses.
New Guidance on Employees Versus Contractors
On July 15, 2015, Administrator David Weil issued a Department of Labor’s (DOL) Administrator’s Interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The 15 page document speaks specifically to the misclassification of employees as independent contractors. The main concern of the DOL is that “some employees may be intentionally misclassified as a means to cut costs and avoid compliance with labor laws.”
The DOL has historically defined “employ” as “to suffer or permit to work” and uses a more recently adopted “economic realities test.” That test uses the following factors, which are analyzed against each other with no single one being determinative.
(A) the extent to which the work performed is an integral part of the employer’s business;
(B) the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss depending on his or her managerial skill;
(C) the extent of the relative investments of the employer and the worker;
(D) whether the work performed requires special skills and initiative;
(E) the permanency of the relationship; and
(F) the degree of control exercised or retained by the employer.
One of the most important paragraphs in the document explains that the label that the employer uses or the agreement between the employer and the worker are NOT determinative. It’s not enough for the employer and the employee to just agree as part of their contract or negotiation that the worker is an independent contractor. The factors in the economic realities test will still prevail.
Another paragraph that is particularly important in our industry describes the element of “degree of control.” Simply having workers who are free to work from home and set their own hours with little supervision does NOT make them independent contractors. The control factor has to be weighed against the other factors.
The document concludes by blatantly summarizing that “most workers are employees under the FLSA’s broad definitions.”
How It Impacts Affiliate Marketing
It’s no secret that the many people in our industry work in a consulting or contract capacity quite frequently. There are quite a few instances that would actually fall under the “independent contractor” status such as guest writers, graphic designers, programmers, and social media or SEO experts.
However, those lines might very easily be crossed if the person doing the work is either working exclusively for one company, is performing work that is integral to the company, or the company is relationship has the signs of permanency (perhaps the giving of executive titles or listing the workers on the employer website).
What’s the difference how you classify workers if both of you are fine with it? Apparently quite a bit. There are major differences in the assessment and collection of taxes, unemployment, overtime policies, and minimum wages.
Right now it does not look like online marketing is being closely scrutinized for labor violations of this type, but as our industry continues to grow, it’s likely that we will become a bigger part of the discussion.
If you are employing people in any way, it’s a good idea to evaluate your relationships and determine whether people you consider to be contractors might actually be employees.
Connie Zimmermann says
Thank you Tricia, this will probably affect me sometime down the line once my business gets really started and grows, and I’m glad to have the heads-up now.
Nate says
As I read this, it appears to affect the service providers (social, SEO, etc), more than a typical OPM agency, unless that OPM only has one client and no employees.
There is a similar law in Canada, but it is more directed at the worker, who is classifying their work as a business. There are similar determining factors, but the effect on the “worker” is losing the ability to pay the corporate tax rate of 18%. They will also have to pay at the personal taxation rate (which is much, much higher. “free” healthcare, etc) The worker also loses the ability to claim many business deductions. I make the reference to the Canadian law, as it appears that both tax agencies are after the same nut.
It is important to structure your business in a particular way to avoid being classified as a “personal service business”. Having employees, multiple clients, and the majority of control in how your services are carried out, you’ll likely satisfy the beast on either side of the border.
(I’m not a lawyer. blah blah blah)
Nate says
I forgot to praise you, Tricia. This is an excellent post, and certainly an issue that contractors and corporations need to pay attention to.